Anthony Rogers, et al. v. Mountain Valley Unified School District, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ROGERS, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02587-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER, AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 MOUNTAIN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., (ECF Nos. 19, 24) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Soter Technologies LLC’s motion to 18 dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).1 (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition and 20 Defendant filed its reply. (ECF Nos. 30, 34.) A hearing was held on September 23, 21 2025,2 at which Plaintiffs Anthony Rogers, Roberto Romero, and Devin Nunez appeared 22 pro se, and attorney Mitchell Turbenson appeared for Defendant Soter Technologies. 23 For the reasons that follow, the Court orders minor Plaintiffs S.N. and T.R., and claims 24 brought on their behalf, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and further 25 recommends GRANTING Soter Technologies’ motion to dismiss.

26 1 This matter proceeds before the…