Anthony Rogers, et al. v. Mountain Valley Unified School District, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY ROGERS, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02587-TLN-CSK Plaintiffs, v. ORDER, AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

MOUNTAIN VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., (ECF Nos. 19, 24) 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Defendant Soter Technologies LLC’s motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).1 (ECF No. 19.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition and Defendant filed its reply. (ECF Nos. 30, 34.) A hearing was held on September 23, 2025,2 at which Plaintiffs Anthony Rogers, Roberto Romero, and Devin Nunez appeared pro se, and attorney Mitchell Turbenson appeared for Defendant Soter Technologies. For the reasons that follow, the Court orders minor Plaintiffs S.N. and T.R., and claims brought on their behalf, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and further recommends GRANTING Soter Technologies’ motion to dismiss.

26 This matter proceeds before the…