Baer

Norman Gerald Daniels, III v. A. Baer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:19-cv-01801California825 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORMAN GERALD DANIELS, III, Case No.: 1:19-cv-01801-KES-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

13 v. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

14 A. BAER, et al. Doc. 71

15 Defendants.

16 17 18 Plaintiff Norman Gerald Daniels, III proceeds pro se in this civil action filed pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 On September 26, 2025, the then assigned magistrate judge issued findings and 22 recommendations, recommending that this matter be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to keep the 23 Court apprised of his current address and for his failure to obey a court order. Doc. 71. 24 Specifically, the magistrate judge found that the relevant factors—that is, the public’s interest in 25 expeditious resolution of litigation; the court’s need to manage its docket; the risk of prejudice to 26 the defendants; the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.