Rosalia Razo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:21-cv-01802California886 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ROSALIA RAZO, Case No. 1:21-cv-01802-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR AWARD

OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO

13 v. THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) 14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. 25) 15 Defendant.

16 17 Pending before the Court is the stipulated request of Plaintiff Rosalia Razo (“Plaintiff”) for 18 the award of attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 19 2412(d), in the amount of $6,200.00 to counsel for Plaintiff, Jonathan O. Peña.1 (Doc. 25). 20 The parties agree that an award of attorney’s fees to counsel for Plaintiff should be made 21 payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a 22 federal debt, then the Commissioner shall cause the payment of fees, expenses, and costs to be made 23 directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, Jonathan O. Peña. Id. at 2. 24 On August 8, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and remanded 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.