Doer
Maxsony Coissy v. Doer, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MAXSONY COISSY, Case No. 1:24-cv-01556-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
13 v. ACTION 14 DOER, et al., (Doc. 14) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Maxsony Coissy is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of 19 Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401, 20 et seq. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On July 18, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and granted 23 plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty 24 days. Doc. 13. The screening order was returned as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Refused” 25 on August 4, 2025. On September 11, 2025, the…