Doer

Maxsony Coissy v. Doer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:24-cv-01556California379 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAXSONY COISSY, Case No. 1:24-cv-01556-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION DOER, et al., (Doc. 14) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Maxsony Coissy is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2401, et seq. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 18, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint and granted plaintiff leave to file a first amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal within thirty days. Doc. 13. The screening order was returned as “Undeliverable, Return to Sender, Refused” on August 4, 2025. On September 11, 2025, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.