Acosta

Jose Acosta v. Super Save & La Michuacana Markets, Inc. dba Super Save Market, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:25-cv-00105California458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00105 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR

SUPER SAVE & LA MICHUACANA ATTORNEYS’ FEES MARKETS, INC. dba SUPER SAVE MARKET, et al., (Docs. 17, 22) Defendants. 17 Jose Acosta, who alleges he is disabled, asserts violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act and state law for the failure to remove barriers to access at the Super Save Market located in Reedley, California. The Clerk of the Court entered default against defendants Super Save & La Michuacana Markets, Inc., Mohammed Jaber, Abdel Jaber, and Sultana Jaber on March 7, 2025. (Docs. 10-13.) Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on April 22, 2025. (Doc. 14.) Thereafter, on June 6, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, along with a request for attorneys’ fees. (Doc. 17.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.