Acosta

Jose Acosta v. Super Save & La Michuacana Markets, Inc. dba Super Save Market, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:25-cv-00105California458 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE ACOSTA, Case No. 1:25-cv-00105 JLT BAM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ENFORCE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR

14 SUPER SAVE & LA MICHUACANA ATTORNEYS’ FEES MARKETS, INC. dba SUPER SAVE 15 MARKET, et al., (Docs. 17, 22) 16 Defendants. 17 18 Jose Acosta, who alleges he is disabled, asserts violation of the Americans with 19 Disabilities Act and state law for the failure to remove barriers to access at the Super Save Market 20 located in Reedley, California. The Clerk of the Court entered default against defendants Super 21 Save & La Michuacana Markets, Inc., Mohammed Jaber, Abdel Jaber, and Sultana Jaber on 22 March 7, 2025. (Docs. 10-13.) Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement on April 22, 2025. (Doc. 14.) 23 Thereafter, on June 6, 2025, plaintiff filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement, along 24 with a request for attorneys’ fees. (Doc. 17.) 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.