Martinez
Joseph Earl Steele v. F. Martinez
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH EARL STEELE, No. 1:25-cv-00187 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING
v. ACTION F. MARTINEZ, (Doc. 14) Defendant. 16 The magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 14.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. at 7.) The Court also informed Plaintiff that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id. at 8, quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and time in which to do so has expired. According to 28 U.S.C. §…