Martinez

Joseph Earl Steele v. F. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:25-cv-00187California305 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH EARL STEELE, No. 1:25-cv-00187 JLT BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION F. MARTINEZ, (Doc. 14) Defendant. 16 The magistrate judge screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 14.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Id. at 7.) The Court also informed Plaintiff that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id. at 8, quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and time in which to do so has expired. According to 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.