Munoz

Da’Juan Birden v. F. Munoz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20251:25-cv-00937California334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DA’JUAN BIRDEN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00937 JLT BAM Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. ACTION, AND DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO CLOSE THIS CASE

F. MUNOZ, (Doc. 13) Defendant.

16 Da’Juan Birden is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 8, 2025, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations that recommended dismissal of this action as an appropriate sanction for failure to obey a court order and for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. (Doc. 13.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within fourteen (14) days. (Id. at 3.) The Court also informed plaintiff that “failure to file objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s factual findings’ on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.