Pfeiffer
James Davenport v. C. Pfeiffer, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES DAVENPORT, Case No.: 1:25-cv-00997-JLT-SKO 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY
13 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS
14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., (Docs. 2 & 9) 15 Defendants.
16
17 Plaintiff James Davenport seeks to hold defendants liable for violations of his civil rights. 18 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 19 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 The magistrate judge recommended plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be 21 denied because plaintiff has accrued three or more strikes and does not qualify for the imminent 22 danger exception pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 8.) The magistrate judge advised that the 23 “[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal.” 24 (Id. at 4-5, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 2014)). Plaintiff did not file 25 objections.1 26