(HC)F.S.S.M.
F.S.S.M. v. Minga Wofford, in official capacity as the Field Office Director of Mesa Verde, Office of Detention and Removal; et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 F.S.S.M.,
12 Petitioner, No. 1:25-cv-01518-TLN-AC
13 14 v. ORDER MINGA WOFFORD, in official capacity 15 as the Field Office Director of Mesa Verde, Office of Detention and Removal; et al., 16 Respondents. 17
18 19 On November 9, 2025, Petitioner F.S.S.M. (“Petitioner”) filed an Ex Parte Motion for 20 Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”) and Motion for Preliminary Injunction in their habeas 21 corpus case. (ECF No. 2.) Petitioner also filed a Motion to Proceed Via Pseudonym. (ECF No. 22 3.) The Court has reviewed both motions. 23 As an initial matter, the Court notes Petitioner’s motion for a TRO exceeds the page limit 24 set forth in this Court’s standing order.1 The motion also contains redactions but there is no 25 pending motion to seal and the Court has not received unredacted copies.2 The Court is unable to 26 1 See https://www.caed.uscourts.gov/caednew/index.cfm/judges/all-judges/50201/tln-civil- 27 standing-order/.
28 2 See E.D. Cal. L. R. 140–141 (Jan. 1, 2025).…