CDCR

Gregory Scott Van Huisen v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20252:23-cv-02900California996 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-02900-DJC-EFB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

14 REHABILITATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a Fifth Amended Complaint (ECF No. 23), which is before 19 the court for screening. 20 Screening Standards 21 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 22 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 23 § 1915A(a). The court must identify cognizable claims or dismiss the complaint, or any portion 24 of the complaint, if the complaint “is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which 25 relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such 26 relief.” Id. § 1915A(b). 27…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.