Ramos
Oscar Ramos v. Lesa Marie Gonzalez, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OSCAR RAMOS, Case No. 2:24-cv-01261-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING RULE 37 EXPENSES 14 LESA MARIE GONZALEZ, et al., (ECF Nos. 25, 27, 28) 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 26, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff Oscar Ramos’s motion to 18 compel Defendants Lesa Marie Gonzalez, individually and dba Dave’s Giant Hamburger, 19 and Ellen Carol Gansberg regarding Plaintiff’s interrogatories, requests for admissions 20 (“RFAs”), and requests for documents (“RFPs”).1 9/26/2025 Order (ECF No. 27); Pl. Mot. 21 (ECF No. 25). Because Plaintiff had not provided the Court with sufficient information to 22 determine the amount of expenses if the Court were to make such an award pursuant to 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(a)(5)(A), the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit his 24 reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, and provided Defendants with the 25 opportunity to respond. 9/26/2025 Order at 7. Plaintiff submitted his reasonable 26
27 1 This case…