Cueva

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL DAVID CARR, No. 2:24-cv-1680 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DANIEL E. CUEVA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302. I. Background On October 2, 2025, the Magistrate Judge issued a screening order in which she found the Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) adequately stated an Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s nutritional needs against defendants Patterson, Dail, Rodriguez, and Sandoval; ADA and RA claims against defendant CMF and defendant Patterson in her official capacity; and a First Amendment retaliation claim and Fourth Amendment unlawful search claim against defendant Silva. ECF No. 44 at 5-6. The Magistrate Judge further found that Plaintiff’s 28 …