California High-Speed Rail Authority v. United States Department of Transportation, et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL No. 2:25-cv-02004-DAD-CKD
AUTHORITY,
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE FILING OF v. SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF (Doc. No. 15) TRANSPORTATION, et al.,
Defendants. 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. (Doc. No. 15.) The parties are directed to file joint or separate supplemental briefing addressing the following issues: 1. Whether the court must rely on the full administrative record in ruling on plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 420 (1971) (“[I]t is necessary to remand this case to the District Court for plenary review of the Secretary’s decision. That review is to be based on the full administrative record that was before the Secretary at the time he made his decision.”); see also American Bioscience, Inc. v.…