Reisig

David Bennett v. Jeff Reisig, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20252:25-cv-02103California4,681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BENNETT, No. 2:25-CV-2103-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner, ORDER v. And JEFF REISIG, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Respondents. 16 David Bennett, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s motion to file under seal, ECF No. 8, motions to appoint counsel, ECF Nos. 10 and 13, motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 11, Petitioner’s first amended petition, ECF No. 12, and Petitioner’s supplemental complaint and motion for preliminary injunction, ECF No. 14. 22 I. BACKGROUND This Court dismissed the original petition with leave to amend on October 15, 2025, finding the petition did not contain a statement of facts to allow the Court to determine whether he has stated a cognizable claim for federal habeas relief pursuant to § 2241. See ECF No. 9. Throughout…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.