Corell

Martin Lee Foster v. Wendy Corell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20252:25-cv-02571California1,546 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN LEE FOSTER, No. 2:25-cv-2571 CSK P Plaintiff, ORDER v. WENDY CORELL, Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a former county prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. As discussed below, plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. II. SCREENING STANDARDS The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.