Chaderick A. Ingram v. The University of Phoenix, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHADERICK A. INGRAM, Case No. 2:25-cv-2652-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THE UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX, INC., Defendant. 16 On September 22, 2025, defendant filed a motion to dismiss this case for failure to state a claim, which it set for hearing on November 13, 2025. ECF Nos. 4 & 8. To date, plaintiff has not responded to defendant’s motion. Under the court’s local rules, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion no later than fourteen days after the date it was filed. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 26 …