Munoz
Earnest S. Harris v. E. Munoz, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01800-JLT-SKO (PC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE MOTION TO MODIFY THE
13 v. DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING
ORDER
14 E. MUNOZ, et al., (Doc. 48) 15 Defendants.
16
17 Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on the following claims: (1) excessive 19 force against Defendants Munoz and Arreguin; (2) deliberate indifference to serious medical 20 needs against Defendant Romero; (3) retaliation against Defendants Munoz and Arreguin; and (4) 21 a due process violation against Defendant Munoz. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 On June 11, 2025, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 44.) The 24 order set deadlines for the completion of all discovery by November 11, 2025, and the filing of 25 pre-trial dispositive motions by January 12, 2026. (Id. at 1, 3.) 26 On November 7, 2025,…