Munoz

Earnest S. Harris v. E. Munoz, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20251:21-cv-01800California613 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01800-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX

PARTE MOTION TO MODIFY THE

v. DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING

ORDER

E. MUNOZ, et al., (Doc. 48) Defendants.

Plaintiff Earnest S. Harris is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on the following claims: (1) excessive force against Defendants Munoz and Arreguin; (2) deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against Defendant Romero; (3) retaliation against Defendants Munoz and Arreguin; and (4) a due process violation against Defendant Munoz. I. BACKGROUND On June 11, 2025, the Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order. (Doc. 44.) The order set deadlines for the completion of all discovery by November 11, 2025, and the filing of pre-trial dispositive motions by January 12, 2026. (Id. at 1, 3.) On November 7, 2025,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.