(SS)Stellman

Danielle Kathleen Stellman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20251:23-cv-00022California1,548 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIELLE KATHLEEN STELLMAN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00022-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION

13 v. FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 14 42 U.S.C. §406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY, (Doc. 23)

16 Defendant.

17 18 Pending before the Court is the motion of Jonathan Omar Peña (“Counsel”), counsel for 19 Plaintiff Danielle Kathleen Stellman (“Plaintiff”), for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 406(b), filed on October 24, 2025. (Doc. 23). The motion seeks attorney’s fees in the 21 amount of $29,415.00 for representing Plaintiff in federal court. Id. at 1. Defendant filed a response 22 to the motion in which Defendant expresses no opposition to the motion, see (Doc. 25); Plaintiff 23 did not file a response to the motion. For the reasons set forth below, Counsel’s motion for 24 attorney’s fees will be granted.1 25 /// 26 /// 27

1 Both parties consented to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.