(SS)Stellman

Danielle Kathleen Stellman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20251:23-cv-00022California1,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIELLE KATHLEEN STELLMAN, Case No. 1:23-cv-00022-CDB

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

COUNSEL’S UNOPPOSED MOTION

13 v. FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. §406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY, (Doc. 23)

Defendant.

17 Pending before the Court is the motion of Jonathan Omar Peña (“Counsel”), counsel for Plaintiff Danielle Kathleen Stellman (“Plaintiff”), for an award of attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), filed on October 24, 2025. (Doc. 23). The motion seeks attorney’s fees in the amount of $29,415.00 for representing Plaintiff in federal court. Id. at 1. Defendant filed a response to the motion in which Defendant expresses no opposition to the motion, see (Doc. 25); Plaintiff did not file a response to the motion. For the reasons set forth below, Counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees will be granted.1 /// ///

1 Both parties consented to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.