Pamela Rosman, et al. v. United States of America
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAMELA ROSMAN, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02584-DJC-SCR Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se in this wrongful death action. Currently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. ECF No. 20. The crux of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is that Plaintiffs do not have a medical expert to testify in support of their wrongful death claims. The Court heard the motion on July 31, 2025. ECF No. 27. Following that hearing, on August 5, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiffs 60 days to “obtain an expert who is willing to opine on the standard of care and causation in support of Plaintiffs’ medical malpractice claim” and file a notice identifying such expert. ECF No. 28 at 3. Plaintiffs were informed that failure to retain an expert would prompt a recommendation that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment…