Cody
Nicholas Cody, Skylar Cody, Kaycie Cody, individually and as guardian ad litem for her minor children K.S.-1 and K.S.-2 v. County of San Joaquin, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICHOLAS CODY, SKYLAR CODY, No. 2:23-cv-02318-TLN-CSK KAYCIE CODY, individually and as 12 guardian ad litem for her minor children K.S.-1 and K.S.-2, 13 ORDER Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 16 Defendants. 17
18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Lazaro Gonzalez (“Gonzalez”) and Rachel 20 Apodaca’s (“Apodaca”) (collectively, “Individual Defendants1”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 21 44.) The motion was fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 49, 51.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court 22 GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Individual Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 1 The Court notes Defendant Charlie Foo (“Foo”) is not a party to the instant motion. The 27 Court also notes that while Defendant Claudette Butman (“Butman”) was named as a defendant in the instant action, Butman has not been served or made an appearance in the matter and is not a 28 party to the instant motion. 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 On October 13, 2023,…