Covello
Lakquan D. Solomon v. Patrick Covello
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAKQUAN D. SOLOMON, 12 Petitioner, No. 2:24-cv-0924-TLN-DMC-P 13 v.
ORDER
14 PATRICK COVELLO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Lakquan D. Solomon (“Petitioner”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings 18 this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. 20 On May 19, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations which were 21 served on the parties, and which contained notice that objections could be filed within fourteen 22 (14) days. (ECF No. 22.) Petitioner filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 (ECF No. 23.) 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 27 …