Jenks

Antwone Stokes v. Jenks, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20252:24-cv-02715California1,258 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWONE STOKES, No. 2:24-cv-02715-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JENKS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint, plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. I. In Forma Pauperis Application Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). II. Screening Order Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.