Payne

Michael Alan Dean Hill v. Lt. Payne, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20252:25-cv-00433California243 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALAN DEAN HILL, No. 2:25-cv-0433 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. LT. PAYNE, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On May 14, 2025, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The amended complaint was due on October 30, 2025. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified ///// ///// ///// 1 || time…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.