Salmonson

Richard Wood v. S. Salmonson, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20252:25-cv-02098California357 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD WOOD, 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:25-cv-2098-TLN-JDP (P) 13 v. 14 S. SALMONSON, et al., ORDER 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard Wood (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil 18 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 10, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 5.) This 23 deadline has passed, and no objections have been filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 25 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 26 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.