Wesley Yielding, et al. v. United States of America, et al.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WESLEY YIELDING, et al., No. 2:25-cv-02643-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

Defendants. 16 The three plaintiffs in this action are proceeding pro se. Their application to proceed in forma pauperis was denied (ECF No. 8); in lieu of paying the fee, they have filed a motion for reconsideration of that order. (ECF No. 11.) They have several pending motions, including two motions for temporary restraining orders (TROs). (ECF Nos. 5 & 16). Because plaintiffs proceed without counsel, this matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs’ motions for TROs are appropriate for decision without oral argument within the meaning of Local Rule 230(g). For the reasons set forth below, the motions for TROs should be denied and the complaint dismissed without leave to amend. I. Procedural Background …