Wesley Yielding, et al. v. United States of America, et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESLEY YIELDING, et al., No. 2:25-cv-02643-TLN-CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

15 Defendants. 16 17 The three plaintiffs in this action are proceeding pro se. Their application to proceed in 18 forma pauperis was denied (ECF No. 8); in lieu of paying the fee, they have filed a motion for 19 reconsideration of that order. (ECF No. 11.) They have several pending motions, including two 20 motions for temporary restraining orders (TROs). (ECF Nos. 5 & 16). Because plaintiffs 21 proceed without counsel, this matter is before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 22 See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiffs’ motions for TROs are appropriate for decision without oral 23 argument within the meaning of Local Rule 230(g). 24 For the reasons set forth below, the motions for TROs should be denied and the complaint 25 dismissed without leave to amend. 26 I. Procedural Background 27 …