Doerer

Shelton Benoite v. J. Doerer, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20251:25-cv-00959California2,306 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHELTON BENOITE , No. 1:25-cv-00959-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION J. DOERER, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 7) 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the instant complaint in this action on August 4, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On September 8, 2025, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the Court’s screening order. Therefore, on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.