Rebecca Wu v. Twin Rivers United Educators and California Teachers Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20252:24-cv-02707California2,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 REBECCA WU, No. 2:24-cv-2707 DAD AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER and TWIN RIVERS UNITED EDUCATORS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff previously requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), and that request was granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), ECF No. 3. The initial complaint was rejected pursuant to the screening process that accompanies IFP status, described below. ECF Nos. 3, 5. The District Judge assigned to this case gave plaintiff leave to file an Amended Complaint, cautioning that “she should only amend her pleadings if she has a good faith basis for allegations that support findings that her claims are not barred by the Rooker- Feldman doctrine and that defendants acted under color of law as required by § 1983.” Id.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.