Rebecca Wu v. Twin Rivers United Educators and California Teachers Association

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 REBECCA WU, No. 2:24-cv-2707 DAD AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER and 13 TWIN RIVERS UNITED EDUCATORS FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and CALIFORNIA TEACHERS 14 ASSOCIATION, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se, and the case was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff previously requested leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis (“IFP”), and that request was granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), ECF No. 3. The 20 initial complaint was rejected pursuant to the screening process that accompanies IFP status, 21 described below. ECF Nos. 3, 5. The District Judge assigned to this case gave plaintiff leave to 22 file an Amended Complaint, cautioning that “she should only amend her pleadings if she has a 23 good faith basis for allegations that support findings that her claims are not barred by the Rooker- 24 Feldman doctrine and that defendants acted under color of law as required by § 1983.” Id.…