Persinger

Jon Persinger, et al. v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20252:24-cv-02967California3,805 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JON PERSINGER, et al., No. 2:24-cv-02967-DAD-CSK 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’

14 COUNTY OF PLACER, SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

15 Defendant. STRIKE PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

16 (Doc. No. 26) 17

18 19 This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended 20 complaint (“SAC”) filed on behalf of plaintiffs Jon Persinger and his wife, Nicole Persinger and 21 defendant’s motion to strike portions of plaintiffs’ SAC. (Doc. No. 26.) On October 14, 2025, 22 defendant’s motion to dismiss was taken under submission pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). (Doc. 23 No. 29.) For the reasons explained below, the court will grant defendant’s motion to dismiss the 24 SAC and deny defendant’s motion to strike portions of plaintiffs’ SAC. 25 BACKGROUND 26 On October 29, 2024, plaintiffs filed their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.