Ziarah Quincy-Kamazz Bynum v. Stanislaus County Superior Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZIARAH QUINCY-KAMAZZ BROAD- Case No. 2:25-cv-2085-WBS-JDP (P)

BYNUM,

12 Petitioner, 13 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. 14

STANISLAUS COUNTY SUPERIOR

15 COURT, 16 Respondent. 17

18 On August 20, 2025, the court notified petitioner that his petition appeared to be unripe 19 and directed him to file an amended petition within thirty days. ECF No. 6. To date, petitioner 20 has not filed an amended petition.1 21 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to 22 meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case based on petitioner’s failure to prosecute or 23 failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon Pres. 24 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he consensus among our 25

1 On October 14, 2025, petitioner filed an exhibit to his initial petition and a motion to 26 proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 9 & 10. The court terminated petitioner’s motion for in 27 forma pauperis status since…