Unknown
Lucio Justo Ramos Carrillo v. Unknown
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LUCIO JUSTO RAMOS CARRILLO, Case No. 2:25-cv-2315-TLN-JDP (P)
Petitioner,
ORDER; FINDINGS AND
v. RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 On August 20, 2025, I ordered petitioner to submit either a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the required filing fee within thirty days. ECF No. 3. Petitioner failed to comply with that order, therefore, on October 10, 2025, I ordered petitioner to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the filing fee, to prosecute, and to comply with court orders. ECF No. 4. In response, petitioned filed two documents that are nonresponsive to the court’s prior orders directing petitioner to file a completed in forma pauperis application or pay the required filing fee. The time for petitioner to comply with the August 20 order has passed. Accordingly, dismissal of the action is warranted. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in…