Jenkins

James Jenkins v. Sanger Police Department, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20251:25-cv-00544California7,570 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES JENKINS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00544-KES-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE A FIRST

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY

COURT OF WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED

SANGER POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., ON COGNIZABLE CLAIM Defendants. (Doc. 1) THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff James Jenkins (“Plaintiff”) is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. Plaintiff’s signed complaint, filed May 8, 2025, is currently before the Court for screening. (Doc. 1.) I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT AND STANDARD The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or if it seeks monetary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.