Kaleh

Travis Justin Cuellar v. Kaleh, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20251:25-cv-00711California321 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TRAVIS JUSTIN CUELLAR, No. 1:25-cv-00711 JLT SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

13 v. ACTION 14 KALEH, et al., (Doc. 13)

15 Defendants.

16 17 The assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that 18 the action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 13.) The Court 19 served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were 20 due within 14 days. (Id. at 8.) The Court also informed Plaintiff that “the failure to file objections 21 within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s 22 factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id., quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 (9th Cir. 23 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time in which to do so has passed. 24 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.