Lathwahn McElroy v. Griggs, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20251:25-cv-00759California617 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATHWAHN MCELROY, ) Case No.: 1:25-cv-0759 JLT EPG ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO v. ) PAY THE FILING FEE ) GRIGGS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) )

On August 18, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to pay the filing fee after finding he was not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. (Doc. 12.) The Court warned Plaintiff that if he failed to pay the filing fee as ordered, this would result in dismissal of this action. (Id. at 3.) Thereafter, the assigned magistrate judge granted Plaintiff an extension to October 15, 2025, to pay the filing fee, noting that no further extensions would be given and advising him that this lawsuit would be dismissed without prejudice if the Court did not receive the filing fee by the October 15, 2025, deadline. (Doc. 14.) On October 14, 2025, Plaintiff filed a second motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.