Charles

Quang Vinh Duong v. Marcos Charles, Warden, California City Correctional Facility, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20251:25-cv-01375California3,597 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 QUANG VINH DUONG, Case No. 1:25-cv-01375-SKO

10 Petitioner, O W R R D IT E R O F G R H A A N B T E I A N S G C P O E R T P I U T S IO U N N F D O E R R 28 11 U.S.C. § 2241 v. 12 (Docs. 1, 2)

13 MARCOS CHARLES, Warden, California City Correctional Facility, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 _____________________________________/

16 17 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Quang Vinh Duong’s Amended Petition for Writ of 18 Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. 1). The undersigned has reviewed the petition and 19 supporting documentation and determines that the matter is suitable for decision without oral 20 argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g).1 For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS 21 the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, DENIES AS MOOT the Motion for Temporary 22 Restraining Order, and ORDERS Petitioner’s immediate release from custody. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 Petitioner is a citizen of Vietnam who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.