Bhavsar

Shauntae Taylor v. Bhavsar, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20251:25-cv-01359California599 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAUNTAE TAYLOR, No. 1:25-cv-01359 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE

14 BHAVSAR, et al., DENIED 15 Defendants. (Docs. 2, 8) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 The assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that 20 Plaintiff be required to pay the $405.00 filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (Doc. 8.) 21 Plaintiff timely filed objections.1 (Doc. 9.) 22 Plaintiff argues that he is in imminent danger because he is at risk of future injury. (Doc. 23 9.) Plaintiff contends he is in imminent danger because he was durable medical equipment 24 devices on a temporary rather than permanent basis and because he is still at the same facility, 25 building, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.