Bahman Asfestani v. Current or Acting Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20251:25-cv-01562California178 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BAHMAN ASFESTANI, Case No. 25-cv-09683-JD 8 Petitioner,

ORDER OF TRANSFER

9 v. 10 CURRENT OR ACTING DIRECTOR,

SAN FRANCISCO FIELD OFFICE,

11 UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 This is a habeas case brought pro se by an immigration detainee pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 15 § 2241. Petitioner challenges his detention by the United States Immigration and Customs a 16 || Enforcement at the Golden State Annex Detention Center in Kern County, which lies in the 3 17 || Eastern District of California. The petition was filed while he was detained at that location. 18 || Accordingly, this action is transferred to the Eastern District of California, as that is the district of 19 detention. See 28 U.S.C. $§ 1406(a), 2241(a); see also Doe v. Garland, 109 F.4th 1188, 1197-98 20 || (9th Cir. 2024). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 Dated: November 13, 2025 23 24 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.