Milan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD B. SPENCER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00682-JLT-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS

v. MOOT RICHARD MILAN, (Doc. No. 99) Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Fee Waiver” filed November 3, 2025. (Doc. No. 99, “”Motion”). Therein, Plaintiff requests an extension of thirty (30) days to submit a certified copy of his trust account statement in order that he be permitted to proceed on his appeal without the prepayment of fees. (Id. at 2:15-16). The Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion as seeking an extension of time.1 A review of the docket in Plaintiff’s appeal reflects that, on October 23, 2025, the Ninth Circuit permitted Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis on his appeal in this case. Spencer v. Milan, No. 25-6670 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2025). Because the Ninth Circuit has already granted

1 A motion’s “nomenclature…