Milan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWARD B. SPENCER, Case No. 1:20-cv-00682-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AS

13 v. MOOT 14 RICHARD MILAN, (Doc. No. 99) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Motion for Fee Waiver” filed November 3, 2025. 18 (Doc. No. 99, “”Motion”). Therein, Plaintiff requests an extension of thirty (30) days to submit a 19 certified copy of his trust account statement in order that he be permitted to proceed on his appeal 20 without the prepayment of fees. (Id. at 2:15-16). The Court construes Plaintiff’s Motion as 21 seeking an extension of time.1 22 A review of the docket in Plaintiff’s appeal reflects that, on October 23, 2025, the Ninth 23 Circuit permitted Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis on his appeal in this case. Spencer v. 24 Milan, No. 25-6670 (9th Cir. Oct. 23, 2025). Because the Ninth Circuit has already granted 25

26 1 A motion’s “nomenclature…