Broomfield

Roderick Washington v. Ronald Broomfield, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20251:25-cv-00958California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RODERICK WASHINGTON, No. 1:25-cv-00958-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

v. FEE RONALD BROOMFIELD, et al.,

Defendants.

15 16 Plaintiff Roderick Washington is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 11, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. Doc. 4. On September 15, 2025, the Court adopted the findings and recommendations and ordered plaintiff to pay the $405.00 filing fee in full within thirty (30) days. Doc. 5. Plaintiff was warned that if he failed to pay the filing fee within the specified time, this action would be dismissed without further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.