Cruz

Aniceto Cruz, et al. v. Does 1-50

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20251:25-cv-01278California820 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANICETO CRUZ, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-01278-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER REQURING PLAINTIFFS TO

SHOW CAUSE IN WRITING WHY

13 v. SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO COMPLY

14 DOES 1-50, WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

15 Defendant. (Doc. 18)

16 THREE (3)-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Relevant Background 19 Plaintiffs Aniceto Cruz, Patricia Flores, Estate of Josafat Bonifacio, minor A.B.T., as 20 successor in interest to Josafat Bonifacio, by and through his purported guardian ad litem Jacqueline 21 M. Torres Maldonado, and minor D.L.M., as successor in interest to Josafat Bonifacio, by and 22 through his purported guardian ad litem, Maritza Plasenia-Mares (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 23 initiated this action with the filing of a complaint against State of California and North Kern State 24 Prison on September 26, 2025. (Doc. 1). On October 22, 2025, Plaintiffs filed the operative,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.