Ortiz

1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 JONATHAN MARQUEZ Case No. 1:23-cv-01782-KES-EPG

10 Plaintiff,

11 v. DISCOVERY ORDER REQUIRING ORTIZ, et al., PARTIES TO EXCHANGE 12 DOCUMENTS Defendants. 13 14 15 To secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will 16 direct that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2 17 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 18 1. Each party has sixty days from the date of service of this order to serve opposing 19 parties, or their counsel, if represented, with copies of the following documents 20 and/or evidence if they have them in their possession, custody, or control, to the 21 extent these documents exist, are relevant, and the parties have not already done

22 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508–09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with 23 the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and orderly…