Maria Ruiz de Martinez v. Aramark Services, Inc., et al.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MARIA RUIZ DE MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00625-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT

ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. TO SUBMIT

12 v. FILING REGARDING STIPULATION OF

DISMISAL

13 ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., et al., (ECF No. 45) 14 Defendants.

15 16 17 On November 17, 2025, Plaintiff and Defendant National Park Service filed a stipulation 18 of dismissal without prejudice of the claims against Defendant National Park Service under 19 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). However, because Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires a 20 stipulation of dismissal to be “signed by all parties who have appeared,” the Court will also 21 require Defendant Aramark Services, Inc. to submit a filing approving or opposing the stipulation 22 of dismissal. See Thacker v. AT&T Corp., No. 2:20-CV-00255-KJM-CKD PS, 2021 WL 23 1784873, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 5, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 4168533 24 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2021) (noting that court was “unaware of any case…