Maria Ruiz de Martinez v. Aramark Services, Inc., et al.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARIA RUIZ DE MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00625-JLT-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC. TO SUBMIT
v. FILING REGARDING STIPULATION OF
DISMISAL
ARAMARK SERVICES, INC., et al., (ECF No. 45) Defendants.
15 16 17 On November 17, 2025, Plaintiff and Defendant National Park Service filed a stipulation 18 of dismissal without prejudice of the claims against Defendant National Park Service under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). However, because Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) requires a stipulation of dismissal to be “signed by all parties who have appeared,” the Court will also require Defendant Aramark Services, Inc. to submit a filing approving or opposing the stipulation of dismissal. See Thacker v. AT&T Corp., No. 2:20-CV-00255-KJM-CKD PS, 2021 WL 1784873, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 5, 2021), report and recommendation adopted, 2021 WL 4168533 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 14, 2021) (noting that court was “unaware of any case…