Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Westlake Financial Services, Inc., et al.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00957-JLT-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

13 v. ACTION

14 WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., (ECF No. 14) et al., 15 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN Defendants. DAYS 16 17 Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis, filed this action on August 4, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On October 15, 2025, the 19 undersigned ordered Plaintiff to file his third amended complaint, limited to twenty-five pages in 20 length. (ECF No. 14.) In its order, Plaintiff was advised that, “If Plaintiff fails to file a third 21 amended complaint in compliance with this order, the Court will recommend to a district judge 22 that this action be dismissed consistent with the reasons stated in this order.” (Id.) (emphasis in 23 original). The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has now passed, and the Court 24 will now recommend that…