Prince Paul Raymond Williams v. Westlake Financial Services, Inc., et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20251:25-cv-00957California1,064 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:25-cv-00957-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF

v. ACTION

WESTLAKE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., (ECF No. 14) et al., OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN Defendants. DAYS 16 Prince Paul Raymond Williams (“Plaintiff”), who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on August 4, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On October 15, 2025, the undersigned ordered Plaintiff to file his third amended complaint, limited to twenty-five pages in length. (ECF No. 14.) In its order, Plaintiff was advised that, “If Plaintiff fails to file a third amended complaint in compliance with this order, the Court will recommend to a district judge that this action be dismissed consistent with the reasons stated in this order.” (Id.) (emphasis in original). The deadline for Plaintiff to file his amended complaint has now passed, and the Court will now recommend that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.