Mendoza

Jorge Contreras v. B. Mendoza, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20251:25-cv-01157California1,169 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE CONTRERAS, Case No. 1:25-cv-01157-KES-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, 13 RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE v. DISMISSED, FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE 14 FILING FEE OR SUBMIT AN APPLICATION

B. MENDOZA, et al.

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS,

15 Defendants. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

16

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN THIRTY

17 (30) DAYS 18

19 20 Plaintiff Jorge Contreras, an inmate at the Madera County when this case was filed on 21 September 8, 2025, proceeds pro se in this civil rights lawsuit filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1). When Plaintiff filed this case, Plaintiff neither paid the filing fee for this action nor 22 submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). The Court issued an order on 23 September 19, 2025, giving Plaintiff forty-five days to either (1) submit a completed and signed 24 IFP application or (2) pay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.