Caro

Steven R.G. Candler v. Abram Caro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20251:25-cv-01409California565 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEVEN R.G. CANDLER, No. 1:25-cv-01409-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CONSTRUING RESPONSE TO ORDER TO

v. SHOW CAUSE AND REQUEST FOR

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION

ABRAM CARO, (ECF No. 12) Defendant.

12 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiff filed the instant action on October 22, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) On October 29, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the action should not be dismissed as duplicative of Candler v. Caro, Case No. 1:24-cv-00301-KES-SAB (PC). (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed a response on November 17, 2025. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff submits that he intended to file his complaint in the California Supreme Court and requests that the Court redirect the complaint to that Court. (Id.) On the operative…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.