Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWOINE BEALER, Case No. 2:23-cv-0284-DC-JDP (P) Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARDEN, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff filed this civil rights action against two Doe defendant in February 2023. ECF No. 1. Since that time, plaintiff has attempted to learn the identities of the Doe defendants. As plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis, on September 4, 2025, I ordered plaintiff to send, within thirty days, the United States Marshal (501 I Street, Suite 5600 Sacramento, CA 95814) two completed subpoenas and a check for $130.00 payable to the USM ($65.00 for each subpoena). ECF No. 34. Plaintiff has not responded to the September 4 order, and this case has remained inactive. The court has the inherent power to control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, including dismissal. Bautista v. Los Angeles Cnty., 216 F.3d 837, 841 (9th Cir. 2000); see Local Rule 110…