Yahiya

Forrest Kendrid v. Yahiya, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20252:23-cv-01145California985 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:23-cv-1145 TLN CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER YAHIYA, et al., Defendants. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff is a former detainee proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion and renewed motion for appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 50.) For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is granted and plaintiff’s renewed motion for appointment of counsel is denied. II. DISCUSSION On or around June 19, 2024, plaintiff was released from the California Medical Facility (“CMF”). (ECF No. 39 at 1-2.) Defendants filed a summary judgment motion on September 17, 2025. (ECF No. 45.) On October 2, 2025, plaintiff filed his first motion for an extension of time to file an opposition to defendants’ summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.