Yahiya

Forrest Kendrid v. Yahiya, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20252:23-cv-01145California985 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FORREST KENDRID, No. 2:23-cv-1145 TLN CSK P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 YAHIYA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff is a former detainee proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis with this 19 civil rights action. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of time 20 to file an opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion and renewed motion for 21 appointment of counsel. (ECF No. 50.) For the following reasons, plaintiff’s motion for an 22 extension of time is granted and plaintiff’s renewed motion for appointment of counsel is denied. 23 II. DISCUSSION 24 On or around June 19, 2024, plaintiff was released from the California Medical Facility 25 (“CMF”). (ECF No. 39 at 1-2.) Defendants filed a summary judgment motion on September 17, 26 2025. (ECF No. 45.) On October 2, 2025, plaintiff filed his first motion for an extension of time 27 to file an opposition to defendants’ summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.