Roy Lee Humphrey v. Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, Juvenile Court, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20252:25-cv-01163California548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROY LEE HUMPHREY, No. 2:25-cv-01163 DJC SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

JUVENILE COURT, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2025, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint and determined it was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and sought damages from defendants who were immune from suit. (ECF No. 8.) The undersigned recommended that the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff has filed objections arguing that his due process claims do not imply the invalidity of his conviction and requests leave to amend to avoid Heck. (ECF No. 11.) Having considered plaintiff’s objections, the undersigned will vacate the findings and recommendations…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.