Roy Lee Humphrey v. Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento, Juvenile Court, et al.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROY LEE HUMPHREY, No. 2:25-cv-01163 DJC SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
15 JUVENILE COURT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff is incarcerated in state prison and proceeding pro se with a civil rights action 19 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2025, the undersigned screened plaintiff’s complaint 20 and determined it was barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and sought damages 21 from defendants who were immune from suit. (ECF No. 8.) The undersigned recommended that 22 the complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without leave to amend. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff 23 has filed objections arguing that his due process claims do not imply the invalidity of his 24 conviction and requests leave to amend to avoid Heck. (ECF No. 11.) 25 Having considered plaintiff’s objections, the undersigned will vacate the findings and 26 recommendations…