Anita Valladores, et al. v. Ashtree Apartments, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20251:20-cv-01155California1,916 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ANITA VALLADORES, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01155-KES-SAB Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DENYING

v. PLAINTIFFS’ PETITION FOR MINOR’S

COMPROMISE

ASHTREE APARTMENTS, LLC, (ECF No. 66) Defendant. 16 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Anita Valladores, Samantha Shepherd and minors D.C., K.C., E.J., and M.J.’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) unopposed petition for minor’s compromise. (ECF No. 66.) The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for the issuance of findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and vacated the hearing set for November 19, 2025. See Local Rule 230(g). Having reviewed the motion, the Court concludes that it does not comply with the Local Rules and thus recommends that it be denied. The Court will, however, consider a renewed motion that complies with the Local Rules and cures the deficiencies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.