Anita Valladores, et al. v. Ashtree Apartments, LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 ANITA VALLADORES, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01155-KES-SAB 12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DENYING
13 v. PLAINTIFFS’ PETITION FOR MINOR’S
COMPROMISE
14 ASHTREE APARTMENTS, LLC, (ECF No. 66) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Anita Valladores, Samantha Shepherd and minors 18 D.C., K.C., E.J., and M.J.’s (collectively “Plaintiffs”) unopposed petition for minor’s 19 compromise. (ECF No. 66.) The matter was referred to the Magistrate Judge for the issuance of 20 findings and recommendations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The 21 Court found this matter suitable for decision without oral argument and vacated the hearing set 22 for November 19, 2025. See Local Rule 230(g). Having reviewed the motion, the Court 23 concludes that it does not comply with the Local Rules and thus recommends that it be denied. 24 The Court will, however, consider a renewed motion that complies with the Local Rules and 25 cures the deficiencies…