Dibbern

Jeffrey Dibbern v. City of Bakersfield, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20251:22-cv-00723California972 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFFREY DIBBERN, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00723-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE

TO RETURN LODGED FILINGS

13 v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

14 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE

IMPOSED

15 Defendants.

ORDER SETTING SHOW CAUSE

16 HEARING

17 18 Relevant Background 19 On September 24, 2025, the parties convened before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. 20 Delaney for a settlement conference. (Doc. 154). The case was settled and the parties agreed to 21 the terms of the settlement agreement as recited on the record, subject to approval by the 22 Bakersfield City Council. Id.; see (Doc. 157, “Transcript of Settlement Conference”). Counsel 23 for Defendants thereafter reported to the Court that the City Council approved the settlement. 24 The Court ordered the parties to file dispositional documents within 30 days (e.g., no later than 25 October 24, 2025). 26 The parties have not filed dispositional…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.