Estate of Michael Frank Marrufo, et al. v. City of Bakersfield, et al.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 19, 20251:24-cv-00274California5,001 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ESTATE OF MICHAEL FRANK Case No. 1:24-cv-00274-CDB MARRUFO, et al., 12 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR LEAVE TO MODIFY THE 13

SCHEDULING ORDER TO AMEND

14 v. THE PLEADINGS

15 CITY OF BAKERSFIELD, et al., (Doc. 18)

16 Defendants. 17 18 Pending before the Court1 is the motion of Plaintiffs Estate of Michael Frank Marrufo, 19 Jennifer Marrufo, individually, and as successor in interest to decedent Michael Frank Marrufo, 20 G.H., V.H., and A.H., individually, and as successors in interest to Michael Frank Marrufo 21 (“Decedent”), by and through their guardian ad litem Jennifer Marrufo (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 22 for leave to modify the scheduling order to permit their belated filing of a first amended complaint, 23 filed on October 7, 2025. (Doc. 18). On October 10, 2025, Defendants City of Bakersfield, Jason 24 Zamora Gonzalez, and Carlos Hernandez-Rodriguez (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an 25 opposition,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.